Archive for the ‘kill people and break things’ Category

Denial of Service against Rense? Maybe first was real, second was NOT!

July 16, 2008

Jeff Rense, OBAMA BLOGONUTS ADMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMINAL ATTACKS TO SHUT DOWN RENSE.COM, by Larry Sinclair, July 14, 2008, Is Obama camp responsible?
July 15, 2008 · No Comments

I attempted to access the website of Jeff Rense and the site would not respond. Jeff Rense has interviewed Larry Sinclair on many occasions.

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/

…..
Update:
While the rense.com site had a quote up earlier reading as follows:

Obama Bloggers Claim
They Crashed Rense.com
7-15-8

BLAHAHAHA!!!!
Looks like we succeeded in getting Jeff Rense’s Show as well as his entire radio network shut down permanently.
Several of us have been working on this project for a few weeks now.
The Bidens were most helpful.
Buh, Bye, Jeff! That’ll teach you to host a pig who is trying to fight The Mob.
heh, heh

1. http://proxify.com/p/011010A1000110/687474703a2f2f7468656d69746368616e646e616e7
3686f772e636f6d2f3f703d3533#comment-5992%23comment-5992
# http://proxify.com/p/011010A1000110/687474703a2f2f
7777772e6f7265676f6e69722e6f72672f
Gumbyon 14 Jul 2008 at 9:20 pm

Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.
Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.
Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.
Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!.Rense.com is DEAD!
R.I.P. Jeff!

For more on the story, visit the new Sinclair site Here:
http://larrysinclair0926.com/?p=491

http://rense.com/general82/ob.htm

It now appears that today’s outage was not Denial-of-Service-Related

Rense.com Was Down Today For Several
Hours Due To A Software Malfunction.
We Apologize For The Inconvenience!

Two sad stories about oil in Africa

June 22, 2008

While reading John Robb, I noted a first sad story about oil in Africa:

News service AFP, citing industry sources, said Chevron had declared a force majeure, which gives it the legal ability to suspend shipments, due to circumstances beyond its control, without running foul of its contracts. The disruption suspended output of 120,000 barrels a day, said the report.
Last year, Chevron’s Nigeria unit produced an average 353,000 barrels a day of crude oil, according to Chevron’s Web site.
Chevron spokesman Kent Robertson said the company could not confirm the cause of the pipeline disruption, the declaration of force majeure nor the impact on production.
The company is investigating the cause of the breach, he said, adding: “We have mobilized our oil spill contingency team to protect the environment.”
An armed youth group has claimed responsibility for the attack on Chevron’s Abiteye-Olero crude pipeline, said Reuters, citing information from the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta. That militant group has led frequent attacks on Nigeria’s crude-oil production, including facilities run by Royal Dutch Shell

linked from:

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/chevron-says-nigerian-oil-pipeline/story.aspx?guid=%7BACF470CE-54D7-43A9-B4DB-234FFAEBD108%7D&dist=msr_1

However, that first sad story could not compare to the one I read in the comments to Robb’s post at the Oil Drum:

ROCKMAN on June 18, 2008 - 2:51pm Permalink | Subthread | Comments top

The various terrorist group have different motivations/goals. There must be even a wide range with any one group. But most seek the support of the general public to some degree. Regardless of one group’s true purpose it should recognize potential motivations of the indigenous folks. Offering to assist the population in its goals, whether the terrorist group has true sympathy or not, is key to local support. And though out history local support has been critical to “the cause”.

Perhaps we should pay more attention to the potential of symbiotic relationships growing between terror groups and nationalists. There is certainly motive for many indigenous folks. I can offer just one insight from my own experiences. Last year I was involved in drilling several wells off the coast of Equatorial Guinea. Don’t feel bad if the country isn’t at all familiar to you…it isn’t to most. It’s a very small island nation off the eastern coast of Nigeria. A population of only 500,000. A Spanish colony until the 80’s. Oil wasn’t discovered there until the late 90’s. Currently ruled by a dictator who took control after killing his uncle, the first dictator after liberation.

I don’t have the numbers at hand but I would guess current oil revenue exceeds $80 billion per year. With their small population they are technically one of the richest per capita in the world. Yet 99% of the population lives in extreme poverty. One of the great shortages is protein…odd you might think for an island nation. But the ruler destroyed the local fishing fleet after a failed invasion by mercenaries in 2002 (led by Margaret Thatcher’s son). The ruler was concerned that another invasion might use the fleet to infiltrate.

The field I drilled sits right off the island in clear sight of the population. In addition to watching tankers carry off their oil to Europe weekly they also watch the burning of 20 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. This is the associated NG produced with the oil. The operator offered to lay a pipeline and transport the gas to the mainland at its own expense but the dictator rejected the offer. He didn’t want to spend the money for a local distribution system.

This is an example of just one little spot on the globe that few know of and even fewer appreciate their contrabution to our endless thirst. How easy would it be for anyone to gain local support by offering a chance to live even a third class existance. I hadn’t thought much about this thread reguading a possibly expanding net work exerting control over more of the production stream. In thinking back to what I saw in EG I’m surprised the bad guys haven’t made a move in that direction.

Who would condemn the EG people for seizing control of their wealth and utilizing their oil reserves to develop their own economy? Makes the fight against “taxation without representation” seem somewhat trivial compared to being starved to death.

Link:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4170#more

It looks like an “Onion” headline, but it’s not: ‘DOD Contracts Out Contractor Oversight’

June 4, 2008

I really wish I was quoting “The Onion” here, but I’m not:

TRUTHOUT ORIGINAL

DOD Contracts Out Contractor Oversight
Wednesday 04 June 2008
by: Maya Schenwar, t r u t h o u t | Report

As private security contractors continue to play a large role in military operations in Iraq, the Pentagon has delegated the duty of overseeing them to a new crop of contractors.(Photo: AP)
The Department of Defense (DOD) now employs contractors to keep contractors in check in Iraq, under a new framework for war industry management solidified last month.

In April, the Pentagon split its largest military contract in Iraq - formerly belonging to the Houston-based corporation KBR, Inc. - among companies Fluor and DynCorp, in addition to KBR.
A fourth company, the British-American service provider Serco, is responsible for managing and overseeing the other three, according to its contract, signed last year and now in effect.

Based on the contract, Serco’s duties include planning activities, managerial work, performance reviews, training and budget recommendations. According to an Army Sustainment Command news release last year, Serco is responsible for “analyzing performance contractors’ costs,” “working with the Army to measure contractor performance” and “recommending process improvements.” The company also serves as a liaison between the other three contractors, and between the contractors and the government.

The Serco deal marks a new level of Defense Department privatization, according to Dina Rasor, the chief investigator of the Follow the Money Project, who founded the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight (POGO).

“It’s gotten to the point where we’re actually outsourcing the oversight,” Rasor told Truthout.

Linkity:

Colonel Sabow was murdered

May 21, 2008

After ten months, David was finally able to obtain the autopsy report and other forensic materials. As he reviewed the material, he slowly began to understand why it had been withheld: The reports contained hard, irrefutable evidence of murder. These are some of the findings:

Colonel Sabow was killed by a 12-gauge shotgun blast that made contact with the soft palate. This is difficult to fathom for two reasons. First, unlike the relatively insensitive hard palate, the soft palate reacts negatively to touch. Contact with the soft palate initiates a gag reflex in a conscious person. Second, the soft palate is narrow, causing David to wonder, “How could my brother have put the shotgun up against his soft palate, when the barrel is literally as wide as the soft palate?” This evidence suggests that Colonel Sabow was unconscious during the time of the shot.

The autopsy report states that the brain was literally pulpified from the shooting. It was completely lacerated and turned to pulp. Yet, the autopsy report states that Colonel Sabow’s lungs were filled with aspirated (inhaled) blood. This would indicate that the colonel was able to breathe without a brain or brain stem, an impossibility. Several minutes of coordinated breathing were necessary to fill the lungs with blood. After the brain was destroyed in this manner, the colonel would have been unable to take a single gasp. It proved that his brother was rendered unconscious and breathed for several minutes before the shooting destroyed his brain.

The report indicated that there was no exit wound. Therefore, the entire explosive force of the 12-gauge discharge was contained within the confines of the skull itself, except for the “blowback” out the mouth. The fact that the entire explosive energy was contained in the brain and rendered the cervical spinal cord functionless precludes any chance of even a slight gasp, let alone several minutes of coordinated respirations. So it is far more likely that a powerful blow to the head rendered Sabow unconscious but breathing for several minutes before the shooting. Autopsy photos and interviews of Sally Sabow and Cheryl Baldwin, an NIS agent in charge of investigation, indicate a large bulge on the back of the colonel’s head, an obvious sign of external trauma. The military has consistently denied this evidence.

Colonel Sabow s fingerprints were not on the gun. Yet, he would have touched the gun several times in a suicide scenario.

No blood was found on the gun or on any portion of the colonel’s body below his upper chest. Yet, from the way he was discovered, it was assumed that the colonel shot himself while sitting in a patio chair. David states, “If he had bent over to stretch his right arm to discharge the weapon and to hold the gun barrel in his mouth with the left hand, the blowback would have drenched the intervening clothing. The posture would have placed his face with mouth open directly over his chest, torso, thighs, legs, and feet. But there was no blood below the chest, none over his bathrobe, none on his pajama bottoms, none over his athletic socks, and none on his slippers. But even more impossible and more ridiculous–not one drop of blood was on the gun!”

Furthermore, photographs demonstrated that the ring and small finger of the left hand were covered with blood, but that there was absolutely none on the thumb, index, middle fingers, and back of his hand. If he held the gun in his mouth, his left hand, the back of the hand, thumb, and forearm, including the gun, would be covered with blood. David states that this is extremely important because the NIS said that Colonel Sabow was sitting in a lawn chair holding the gun in his mouth against the soft palate, his left hand grasping the barrel. He then supposedly reached down with his right hand to depress the trigger with his right thumb or index finger. If the weapon had been discharged in that position, blood would have blown back, covering his thumb and index finger, and the web of the hand and the gun. But there was no blood there whatsoever. David points out, “Indeed, when you look at the way he was lying, the ring and little fingers were fairly close to his mouth, and the left forearm was right in front of his mouth.”

After careful study of the material, evidence of homicide was obvious.

link

Travis Twiggs kills — but it is really an epidemic?

May 20, 2008

Iraq Vet Who Wrote About His PTSD Kills Self, Brother

By Greg Mitchell
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003804988

Published: May 17, 2008 10:55 AM ET

NEW YORK The epidemic of suicides among veterans of the Iraq war with PTSD continues. The latest that has surfaced involves a decorated vet who wrote about his PTSD for the Marine Corps Gazette– and this week killed himself and his brother after a long police chase in Arizona.





”All this violent behavior, him killing his brother, that was not my husband. If the PTSD would have been handled in a correct manner, none of this would have happened,” Kellee Twiggs, the wife of Staff Sgt. Travis Twiggs, said. She said he began changing after his second tour of duty in Iraq, and worsened after he returned from his third stint there, when he lost two good friends from his platoon.

”He went and saw a physician’s assistant who said that was the severest case of PTSD she’d seen in her life,” Kellee Twiggs said, according to published reports. Twiggs had been absent without leave since May 5.

Travis Twiggs was given medications for mood elevation and sleeping to get him calmed down before beginning therapy. But again he was sent back to Iraq “and he was very, very different, angry, agitated, isolated and so forth,” upon his return, Kellee Twiggs said, according to the Associated Press. “He was just doing crazy things.”

She said her husband was treated in the psychiatric ward of Bethesda Naval Medical Center and then sent to a Veterans Affairs Department facility for four months. But she said she couldn’t understand why he was not sent to a specialized PTSD clinic in New Jersey.

”They let him out. He was OK for a while and then it all started over again,” she said, according to AP, adding that Travis Twiggs was with the Wounded Warrior Regiment and accompanied a group to Washington a few weeks ago where he met President Bush at the White House.

In his Marine Corps Gazette article, written after his fourth tour, he wrote: “All of my symptoms were back, and now I was in the process of destroying my family,” he wrote.


    “My only regrets are how I let my command down after they had put so much trust in me and how I let my family down by pushing them away.”


Here’s the criticism I always hear from USMil boosters: There are huge numbers of folks in uniform, a dozen killings is not an epidemic.

I don’t understand the kind of guilt that would make him write that he had let command down after they had placed trust in him.

Newsmax thinks Mexico is actually in a civil war

May 14, 2008
Drug Civil War Rages in Mexico

Sunday, May 11, 2008 7:10 PM

By: Phil Brennan Article Font Size

A full-scale civil war is raging in Mexico — and few are paying attention.

Drug cartels seeking to keep control over huge swathes of Mexico have been on a rampage. In the past two weeks alone, at least 10 police officials have been murdered -…
So far, estimates say more than 3,000 Mexicans have been killed, with almost 1,000 deaths this year alone in a brutal struggle by the civilian government to reassert authority.

Who exactly made those estimates?

Linkity:
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/drug_mexico_cartel/2008/05/11/95167.html

Mexico shooting

May 10, 2008

Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, May 9, 2008; Page A01

MEXICO CITY, May 8 — Gunmen assassinated Mexico’s national police chief Thursday, blasting him with nine bullets outside his home in the capital and dealing a significant setback to the government’s campaign against drug cartels.

Edgar Eusebio Millán Gómez, the public face of Mexico’s offensive against drug cartels, became the highest-ranking law enforcement official to be killed since the launch of the effort 17 months ago. The assassination could give new confidence to drug cartels blamed for 6,000 killings in the past 2 1/2 years, and embolden other anti-government groups in this violence-plagued nation.

Gary Brecher fans rejoice, TakiMag has two by Brecher

May 8, 2008

Rejoice, rejoice, o war nerd fanboys, to you has come Gary Brecher.


demography

And


eating soup

Alex Jones: DC Madam, Palfrey, was murdered

May 4, 2008

Alex Jones is reporting that a whore-monger was murdered for knowing too much.

No one is very surprised.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/050308_overwhelming_evidence.htm

Jane Harman cites 29% rape rate as “epidemic”

April 2, 2008

Sexual assaults are frequent, and frequently ignored, in the armed services.
By Jane Harman
March 31, 2008
The stories are shocking in their simplicity and brutality: A female military recruit is pinned down at knifepoint and raped repeatedly in her own barracks. Her attackers hid their faces but she identified them by their uniforms; they were her fellow soldiers. During a routine gynecological exam, a female soldier is attacked and raped by her military physician. Yet another young soldier, still adapting to life in a war zone, is raped by her commanding officer. Afraid for her standing in her unit, she feels she has nowhere to turn.

These are true stories, and, sadly, not isolated incidents. Women serving in the U.S. military are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire in Iraq.

The scope of the problem was brought into acute focus for me during a visit to the West Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center, where I met with female veterans and their doctors. My jaw dropped when the doctors told me that 41% of female veterans seen at the clinic say they were victims of sexual assault while in the military, and 29% report being raped during their military service. They spoke of their continued terror, feelings of helplessness and the downward spirals many of their lives have since taken.

Numbers reported by the Department of Defense show a sickening pattern. In 2006, 2,947 sexual assaults were reported — 73% more than in 2004. The DOD’s newest report, released this month, indicates that 2,688 reports were made in 2007, but a recent shift from calendar-year reporting to fiscal-year reporting makes comparisons with data from previous years much more difficult.

The Defense Department has made some efforts to manage this epidemic — most notably in 2005, after the media received anonymous e-mail messages about sexual assaults at the Air Force Academy. The media scrutiny and congressional attention that followed led the DOD to create the Sexual Assault and Response Office. Since its inception, the office has initiated education and training programs, which have improved the reporting of cases of rapes and other sexual assaults. But more must be done to prevent attacks and to increase accountability.

At the heart of this crisis is an apparent inability or unwillingness to prosecute rapists in the ranks. According to DOD statistics, only 181 out of 2,212 subjects investigated for sexual assault in 2007, including 1,259 reports of rape, were referred to courts-martial, the equivalent of a criminal prosecution in the military. Another 218 were handled via nonpunitive administrative action or discharge, and 201 subjects were disciplined through “nonjudicial punishment,” which means they may have been confined to quarters, assigned extra duty or received a similar slap on the wrist. In nearly half of the cases investigated, the chain of command took no action; more than a third of the time, that was because of “insufficient evidence.”

This is in stark contrast to the civilian trend of prosecuting sexual assault. In California, for example, 44% of reported rapes result in arrests, and 64% of those who are arrested are prosecuted, according to the California Department of Justice.

The DOD must close this gap and remove the obstacles to effective investigation and prosecution. Failure to do so produces two harmful consequences: It deters victims from reporting, and it fails to deter offenders. The absence of rigorous prosecution perpetuates a culture tolerant of sexual assault — an attitude that says “boys will be boys.”

I have raised the issue with Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Although I believe that he is concerned, thus far, the military’s response has been underwhelming — and the apparent lack of urgency is inexcusable.

Congress is not doing much better. Although these sexual assault statistics are readily available, our oversight has failed to come to grips with the magnitude of the crisis. The abhorrent and graphic nature of the reports may make people uncomfortable, but that is no excuse for inaction. Congressional hearings are urgently needed to highlight the failure of existing policies. Most of our servicewomen and men are patriotic, courageous and hardworking people who embody the best of what it means to be an American. The failure to address military sexual assault runs counter to those ideals and shames us all.

Jane Harman (D-Venice) chairs the House Homeland Security subcommittee on intelligence.

Source:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-harman31mar31%2C0%2C5399612.story